8/3/2023 0 Comments Race into space android![]() ![]() Everything old is new again, at least that's how it must feel to market watchers as another tiny, unprofitable company, promising to reshape an entire industry, suddenly goes from completely overlooked to front and center. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes sentenced to 18 years for role in Jan. GOP senator vows to delay debt ceiling deal lacking ‘substantial reform’īiden assures Americans on Social Security, VA as debt default date nears GOP negotiator says White House ‘refusing to negotiate’ on work requirementsĭoug Mastriano decides against launching Senate bid House leaves town with no debt ceiling deal ĭemocrats seek unlikely debt ceiling savior: Mitch McConnell Mexican president tells Florida Hispanics: Don’t give ‘one single. 6 defendants, including TrumpĪmericans more sure about who they don’t support in 2024 race than who they. 6 pardon remarksĭeSantis says he’ll consider pardoning Jan. Kavanaugh joins Supreme Court liberals in disagreeing with new wetlands testĭemocrats unanimously back debt ceiling discharge petitionĬheney criticizes DeSantis for Jan. Is Iran unlocking the gates to Armageddon? Why the Wagner boss is saying Russia could lose the war House passes measure overturning Biden’s student debt forgiveness program ![]() A SpaceX Starship filled with helium 3, delivered to Earth and sold to companies developing fusion power plants, would also be proof that the Artemis Alliance can create a space-based economy using lunar resources.ĭemocrats erupt in laughter after Greene calls for decorum in House Many believe the substance will fuel clean, affordable and abundant fusion energy. demagogueryīoosting Medicare Advantage can improve health care quality and costsĪstronauts on the moon can also mine the regolith for helium 3, an isotope deposited on the moon by billions of years of solar wind. The debt ceiling negotiation: common sense vs. The moon-built solar panels can then be used to build a prototype space-based solar power station to collect solar energy in space and beam it down to an Earth-based receiving station. ![]() But as the Base Camp expands to a full-scale colony, the Artemis alliance can do more.įor example, it can take Blue Origin up on its proposal to build solar panels using lunar material. The Lunar Base Camp planned for the 2030s can be sustained by mining the moon for water, oxygen and building materials. Still, NASA and its partners can do several things to prove that the path to economically developing the moon and, in time, the rest of the solar system through the participants in the NASA-led Artemis program. China is also overly dependent on industrial espionage for innovation However, considering Beijing’s tendency to apply a heavy hand to private business, one could cast doubt on that prediction. By 2030, according to a congressionally mandated report, China will become a global competitor. America is going back to the moon partly because of these new commercial partners.Īccording to American intelligence, China is making great strides in establishing its own commercial space sector. Other space launch startups include Blue Origin, Relativity Space and Rocket Lab. Everyone knows about billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk and how his commercial space company SpaceX has lowered the cost of spaceflight by orders of magnitude. NASA and its partners also lead in the economic development of space. Their real reason is more likely that the Artemis Accords would prevent China in particular from establishing a hegemony on the moon and other celestial bodies. ![]() Their excuse is apparently that they feel the accords are too slanted toward the United States and Western commercial interests. Over 20 nations have signed the Artemis Accords, with Germany and India remaining holdouts.Ĭhina and Russia oppose the Artemis Accords. The accords are a non-controversial set of rules that mandate cooperation and noninterference, based on legal precedent. The second is which side demonstrates the greater ability to economically develop space, starting with the moon.Īs far as rule making goes, the NASA-led alliance has the edge, thanks to the Artemis Accords. The first is which side gets to make the rules for operating in space. But what constitutes a victory in Space Race 2.0? Surely the winner will not just be the side that returns humans to the moon first?Ī recent article in Foreign Policy suggests that two metrics exist to determine who wins the new space race. Over 50 years later, another space race has developed between NASA, along with a coalition of nations and private companies, and the People’s Republic of China. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |